An argument against the legalization of drugs in america

And no one should underestimate the possibility that the use of stimulant drugs could spread very much wider, and become far more general, than it is now, if restraints on their use were relaxed. Legal marijuana will move distribution out of the back alley and place it under the scrutiny of a regulatory body that could ensure quality control.

And this is despite the fact that 14 percent of the gross domestic product of the United States to say nothing of the efforts of other countries goes into the fight against death.

Evidence is mounting that this policy has not only exacerbated many public health problems, such as adulterated drugs and the spread of HIV and hepatitis B and C infection among injecting drug users, but has created a much larger set of secondary harms associated with the criminal market.

Advertisement Or to take another example. A more practical solution than legalizing marijuana is something akin to what the Netherlands did 30 years ago and Portugal, Mexico, British Columbia, and other countries are experimenting with today…decriminalization.

The pros and cons of drug legalization in the U.S.

Much of this violence takes place in the home, as the relatives of crack takers will testify. So long as there are addicts who have to resort to the black market for their drugs, there will be drug-associated crime. See, if you look at the drug war from a purely economic point of view, the role of the government is to protect the drug cartel.

The conclusion was inescapable: Marijuana is far more powerful than it used to be. Drug legalization or decriminalization is opposed by a vast majority of Americans and people around the world.

Moreover, people might be more encouraged to take more dangerous drugs. Many drug users commit murder, child and spouse abuse, rape, property damage, assault and other violent crimes under the influence of drugs.

Arguments for and against drug prohibition

This is just what is happening with the idea of legalizing drugs: Some proponents [97] of decriminalization say that the financial and social costs of drug law enforcement far exceed the damages that the drugs themselves cause.

Ironically, the current drug control regulations hamper access to controlled opiate medications for therapeutic use. Very often it impairs their ability to pursue gainful employment and promotes parasitism.

We all value freedom, and we all value order; sometimes we sacrifice freedom for order, and sometimes order for freedom. Department of Justice, DEA, Marijuana is relatively easy to lay hands on, meaning that anybody with a desire to alter their state of mind with a substance can likely access it though if this is the actual standard-bearer of a gateway drug, as some would argue, then studies have also shown alcohol to be the true gateway substance.

After so many years of drug control experience, we now know that a coherent, long-term strategy can reduce drug supply, demand and trafficking. Studies have found that cannabis and tobacco smoke contain some of the same carcinogens -- but cigarettes, which contain nicotine, cause significantly more harm than marijuana, which contains cannabinoids.

There is no correlation between the harshness of drug laws and the incidence of drug-taking: It was better, he said, to be Socrates discontented than a fool satisfied.

Legal marijuana is all but synonymous with advertised marijuana. Walton, Judge Reggie B. Position Paper in Opposition to the Legalization of Drugs. Legalizing marijuana, although arguable, is ineffective public policy.

The gap between the law and the underlying use of illicit drugs is cause for a great debate, with vocal arguments from both sides. The corruption of the police, the luring of children of 11 and 12 into illegal activities, the making of such vast sums of money by drug dealing that legitimate work seems pointless and silly by comparison, and the turf wars that make poor neighborhoods so exceedingly violent and dangerous, would all cease at once were drug taking to be decriminalized and the supply regulated in the same way as alcohol.

Earlier this year, Wisconsin Gov. To the contrary, if the use of narcotics and stimulants were to become virtually universal, as is by no means impossible, the number of situations in which compulsory checks upon people would have to be carried out, for reasons of public safety, would increase enormously.

All active ingredients have to be identified and their chemistry determined. And when such a narrowly conceived freedom is made the touchstone of public policy, a dissolution of society is bound to follow. The arguments in favor of legalizing the use of all narcotic and stimulant drugs are twofold: Moreover, far from being expanders of consciousness, most drugs severely limit it.

So long as there is the possibility of a lucrative racket or illegal traffic, such people will find it and extend its scope. The problem of reducing the amount of crime committed by individual addicts is emphatically not the same as the problem of reducing the amount of crime committed by addicts as a whole.

Studies have also shown that changes in the brain due to marijuana use are likely reversible and that the legalization of medical marijuana may reduce suicide rates.

Illegal drugs—and here I refer chiefly to cocaine, heroin, PCP, and methamphetamine—have three prices that are much higher than what they would be if the sale were legal.

What do you think? But just look at Liverpool, where 2, people of a population ofreceive official prescriptions for methadone: Walton, Judge Reggie B. The BCS figures, published in Octobershowed that the proportion of frequent users in the 16—24 age group i.Sep 01,  · The central problem with legalizing drugs is that it will increase drug consumption under almost any reasonable guess as to what the legalization (or more modestly, the decriminalization) regime.

About % of the American population uses illicit drugs [2], meaning that's almost 1/10th of the entire population of America that can be taxed even more, generating way more than the measly $2 million from Colorado in a month alone.

The Legalization of Drugs, appearing in the series "For and Against" edited by R. G. Frey for Cambridge University Press, raises the seldom-asked philosophical question of the justification, if any, of imprisoning persons for drug offenses.

America is going to pot — and no one much seems to care. Sure, Florida opted on Election Day not to take the plunge into full marijuana legalization, but that made the state an exception to the. Nov 07,  · The Argument against Drug Prohibition - The failure of prohibition to prevent consumption of illicit drugs shows that existing policies do not work.

It would be preferable to use the money saved by ending prohibition to provide more drug rehabilitation centres and more drug palmolive2day.coms: 3.

We are a dedicated group of individuals, parents, business owners, medical professionals, crime and safety officials, young and old - all working to defeat the legalization of marijuana in .

An argument against the legalization of drugs in america
Rated 4/5 based on 31 review